#Mac os x system requirements for mac os
#Mac os x system requirements mac os
#Mac os x system requirements upgrade
#Mac os x system requirements pro

With larger RAM requirements, new RAM standards are adopted. MacBook, Late 2007 (although it wonвЂ™t run Mavericks, this needs a Late 2008 or later model).This would make the following Macs the minimum: Of all the changes Apple could put in place, upping to 4 GB is one of the most likely. The move to 64-bit architecture and operating systems has enabled 4 GB and higher RAM support, and even now 4 GB is considered the minimum for optimum running. Mountain Lion and Mavericks requires 2 GB of RAM, but really comes in to its own with 4 GB or more installed. However, no MacBook was made with 512 MB video RAM, so once again this would cut out the entire MacBook range.

#Mac os x system requirements pro

2006 Mac Pro with 8800GT card (although it didnвЂ™t support Mavericks until Early 2008 model).

This would mean the following Macs would be the lowest: Could they raise that requirement to 512MB video RAM. With each release of OS X becoming heavier graphically, an increase in video memory could be possible to ensure smooth delivery. Mountain Lion and Mavericks increased the video requirements, needing 256 MB вЂ“ with the exception of some 2007 iMac 20вЂќ and Early 2009 Mini models, which only have 128 MB video memory. So it may be i5 and Xeon chips are supported. They all feature Xeon processors, so I am not sure where they would sit with this theory, but Apple surely wouldnвЂ™t cut their high end machine вЂ“ even the new 2013 Mac Pro has Xeon chips. There were no Mac Pros with i5 processors. However, no MacBook was made with an i5 processor, which would cut that range out altogether.

2006 Mac Pro (although it didnвЂ™t support Mavericks until the Early 2008 model).

OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion and 10.9 Mavericks increased that to a 64-bit kernel and a Mac with 64-bit EFI.Д¬ould version 10.10 drop all Core 2 Duo processors altogether and require an i5 or higher? This would mean the following Macs would be the minimum: OS X 10.7 Lion was Core 2 Duo only, leaving behind Core Duo/Core Solo Macs, all introduced during 2006. Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard was the first Intel only version of OS X. Will Apple increase the requirements for OS X 10.10? If they do, is there a clear cutoff path? LetвЂ™s look at what possibilities this could create.

#Mac os x system requirements mac os

On a side note, with Mountain Lion, Apple silently dropped the Mac from Mac OS X, simply calling it OS X.

#Mac os x system requirements for mac os

Originally Mac OS X stood for Mac OS 10, but the numbering seemed to have fallen by the wayside in favour of the naming scheme, so perhaps they could drop numbering altogether. Will they jump to 10.10, which seems the most obvious choice? Could they move to OS X 10.X?. However, even the numbering scheme is debated. OS X 10.10 is rumoured to be called Syrah, a type of red grape grown in specific regions, one of which is in California. NameДЄpple switched from its cat naming scheme used in all versions of OS X previous to 10.9В to place names in California with the release of Mavericks, a surfing location.

#Mac os x system requirements upgrade

However, the biggest surprise was that Apple didnвЂ™t charge for it, offering it as a free upgrade to anyone running OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard or later.ДЇast forward 12 months, and the rumour mill for the successor to Mavericks is ramping up, which should be announced at the Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) in June. I came to the conclusion there was no clear cutoff line and thought Apple would leave the requirements the same as Mountain Lion. This years WWDC should see an announcement regarding the next version of Mac OS X, but will you be able to run it?Д«ack in mid 2012, shortly after the release of OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, I began speculating about what Mac OS X 10.9 would require, or if indeed Apple would increase the requirements at all (see Which Macs Might OS X 10.9 Leave Behind).